News You Can Use: 11/13/2019


Photo by Elijah O’Donnell on Unsplash

  • Facebook launches ‘news tab’ section with USA TODAY and other publishers: What to expect

    At a launch event Friday in New York, CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested that while starting small, Facebook News could reach 20 to 30 million people in a “few years.”

    During the initial phase, Facebook plans to showcase original reporting from local properties in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, Philadelphia, Houston, Washington, Miami, Atlanta and Boston.

    “The fact that local news is part of this big Facebook rollout goes to the fact of how important trust is, and that local news is where that’s at,” says Steve Chung, chief digital officer for Fox Television Stations.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/10/25/facebook-launches-news-tab-usa-today-wsj-latimes-buzzfeed/2449387001/

  • Mark Zuckerberg makes the case for Facebook News

    Zuckerberg was also asked about how Facebook will deal with accuracy and quality, particularly given the recent controversy over its unwillingness to fact check political ads.

    He sidestepped the political ads question, arguing that it’s unrelated to the day’s topics, then said, “This is a different kind of thing.” In other words, he argued that the company has much more leeway here to determine what is and isn’t included — both by requiring any participating publishers to abide by Facebook’s publisher guidelines, and by hiring a team of journalists to curate the headlines that show up in the Top Stories section.

    “People have a different expectation in a space dedicated to high-quality news than they do in a space where the goal is to make sure everyone can have a voice and can share their opinion,” he said.

    https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/25/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-news/

  • Facebook launches dedicated news tab in U.S.
  • Facebook News launches with Breitbart as a source

    On Friday, Bernstein tweeted, “One way to think about Facebook naming Breitbart a ‘trusted news source’: my investigation two years ago contained revelations so damning Breitbart funder Robert Mercer stepped down as CEO of his hedge fund. But it’s good enough for Zuck & co.”

    The New York Times’ Charlie Warzel wrote in a tweet that Breitbart “being in Facebook’s trusted partners is clarifying.” Why? Well, he pointed out “it’s the same principle as dinner” with people like Fox host Tucker Carlson. Which is to say, “FB’s perspective seems to be that if you achieve a certain [amount] of scale and influence, the company will engage earnestly with you.” Warzel said “it’s an outdated idea of media power.”

    At Friday’s Paley Center event, the New York Times’ Marc Tracy asked Zuckerberg about the decision to include Breitbart. Zuckerberg said he believes “you want to have content that represents different perspectives.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/26/media/facebook-news-breitbart/index.html

  • Why the Facebook News tab shouldn’t be trusted

    But what’s not central to Facebook’s survival will never be central to its strategy. News is not going to pay the bills, and it probably won’t cause a major change in its hallowed growth rate. Remember that Twitter, which hinges much more on news, is 1/23rd of Facebook’s market cap.

    So hopefully at this point we’ve established that Facebook is not an ally of news publishers.

    At best it’s a fickle fair-weather friend. And even paying out millions of dollars, which can sound like a lot in journalism land, is a tiny fraction of the $22 billion in profit it earned in 2018.

    Whatever Facebook offers publishers is conditional. It’s unlikely to pay subsidies forever if the News tab doesn’t become sustainable. For newsrooms, changing game plans or reallocating resources means putting faith in Facebook it hasn’t earned.

    https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/facebooks-news-not-yours/

News You Can Use: 3/21/2018 (Special Edition)

This week’s “News You Can Use” is a special edition covering the Facebook Cambridge Analytica issue.  It is popping up in a few of my posts, so I decided to consolidate everything into one post.

  • Cambridge Analytica: all the news about Facebook’s data privacy scandal

    Facebook said late Friday that it had suspended Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL), along with its political data analytics firm, Cambridge Analytica, for violating its policies around data collection and retention. The companies, which ran data operations for Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential election campaign, are widely credited with helping Trump more effectively target voters on Facebook than his rival, Hillary Clinton. While the exact nature of their role remains somewhat mysterious, Facebook’s disclosure suggests that the company improperly obtained user data that could have given it an unfair advantage in reaching voters.

    Also:

    The CEO of controversial data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica was suspended today after he was filmed by undercover journalists appearing to encourage the use of beautiful women to entrap politicians as part of election influence campaigns. Alexander Nix will face a “full, independent investigation” of his comments, the company’s board said in a press release.

    “In the view of the Board, Mr. Nix’s recent comments secretly recorded by Channel 4 and other allegations do not represent the values or operations of the firm and his suspension reflects the seriousness with which we view this violation,” the company said in a statement posted to its website. “We have asked Dr. Alexander Tayler to serve as acting CEO while an independent investigation is launched to review those comments and allegations.”

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/19/17141266/facebook-cambridge-analytica-user-data-donald-trump-campaign-2016-election

  • Facebook Ignites Debate Over Third-Party Access to User Data

    The current controversy has its roots in a 2007 decision by Facebook to give outsiders access to the company’s “social graph”—the friend lists, interests and “likes” that tied Facebook’s user base together. Tapping that rich store of information required that a person create an app and plug it into Facebook’s platform.

    The move helped Facebook become a fixture in its members’ lives, catapulting the company from 58 million users to more than 2 billion today. It also addressed criticism from people who argued the company shouldn’t have sole custody over the data generated by users.

    Also:

    In 2014, Facebook said it would reverse course after users questioned their data being shared with outsiders without their knowledge. Those changes went into effect in 2015, forcing many dating, job-search and political apps to close their doors, and sparking a fresh round of criticism that Facebook changed its rules at whim.

    Despite the changes, Facebook couldn’t ensure data already gleaned by developers wasn’t shared with third parties. Such a move would violate the Facebook policies governing how third-party developers can deploy data they obtained from the company.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-ignites-debate-over-third-party-access-to-user-data-1521414746

  • Facebook under fire over claims Trump consultants mined data

    So…I don’t normally use Fox News clips on this blog, but the first 4 videos on this topic are from Fox, which made me think of this article from Wired that documents Murdoch’s displeasure at Facebook changing their news algorithm and how there would be a price to pay if it wasn’t fixed.
  • The Problem Is Facebook, Not Cambridge Analytica

    There’s plenty of evidence that Brad Parscale, who ran the digital side of Trump’s campaign, worked closely with Facebook. Using the platform’s “Lookalike Audiences,” he could find people who resemble known Trump supporters. Facebook also has the capacity to target ads to the friends of people who have “liked” a page — a Trump campaign page, for example.

    Targeting messages to millions of specific people without going directly through Facebook is messier and probably more expensive than using the social platform’s own tools. All Facebook requires for access to its data trove is a reasonable fee.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-03-20/facebook-not-cambridge-analytica-is-the-source-of-the-problem

  • How to delete Facebook

    If you are ready to delete your account, you can click this link, which will take you to the account deletion page. (Facebook doesn’t have the delete account option in its settings, for some reason.) Once you click “Delete My Account,” your account will be marked for termination, and inaccessible to others using Facebook.

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/20/17142806/how-to-delete-facebook-page-account-data-privacy

  • Google is taking advantage of Facebook’s weak news reputation:

    There are three specific goals of the Google News Initiative: highlight accurate journalism while fighting misinformation, particularly during breaking news events; help news sites continue to grow from a business perspective; and create new tools to help journalists do their jobs. Google is serious about supporting these goals, too, pledging to invest $300 million over the next three years.

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/20/17142788/google-news-initiative-fake-news-journalist-subscriptions

Extra Content:
How could I not share my recent SourceCast episode on Facebook’s methods of attracting children to the platform

Photo by Alexandre Croussette on Unsplash

News You Can Use: 1/27/2016

sn_fire_Tirza van Dijk

  • Outside-In Issues are Shaping Modern Procurement — Is Your Organization Ready?

    One has to remember that stagnant GDP growth, rising inflation, steady or increasing unemployment, rising inequality between the rich and poor and an increasing need for resources in greatly limited supply are creating a perfect economic storm that will sink any company not ready to compete in the global marketplace that has taken hold in most large economies. Value chains are becoming bifurcated and turned on their heads. Consumers want local and they want global on demand. Products need to come from everywhere and go to everywhere, be compliant with local and foreign regulations, be produced in a socially responsible fashion and be sold through the appropriate digital channels. And this all has to be done by Monday morning at 9 am.

    http://sourcinginnovation.com/wordpress/2016/01/20/outside-in-issues-are-shaping-modern-procurement-is-your-organization-ready/

  • The Most Damaging Thing an Employer Can Say to an Employee

    There’s one thing a manager should never say to an employee: you will not move up here.

    http://www.entrepreneur.com/video/254262

  • Better Intel Through Better Info: Why CPOs Should Focus on Information, Not Technology (Part 2)

    If you want to solve this problem of better intelligence through better information, you can’t just outsource it away. There is nothing wrong with setting up a center of excellence (CoE) for supply market intelligence and using it to parse out intelligence requests from stakeholders via category managers to low-cost third parties. But it’s only a temporary fix. You need to get your procurement information management capabilities understood and improved so that you’ll be able to take advantage of the massive and diverse forms of digital assets that are getting built out.

    http://spendmatters.com/cpo/better-intelligence-through-better-information-why-cpos-should-focus-on-information-not-technology-part-2/

  • I am just going to leave this one right here…
    DONALD TRUMP SAYS HE’D GET APPLE TO MAKE ITS PRODUCTS IN AMERICA

    Of course, even if Trump is elected president, it won’t happen. There are a number of reasons why Apple can’t or won’t bring its manufacturing jobs to the US:

    Legal reason: For starters, there is no U.S. law that can force an American company to make its products in America, notes Engadget. Any attempt at passing such a law would be vigorously opposed by virtually every U.S. company, Constitutional scholars, and likely, even most Republicans in Congress.

    China reason: Then there is China, which is increasingly becoming Apple’s most important sales territory in the world. No tech company wants to annoy China, the country with the largest amount of consumers on the globe. Can you imagine how China would react if Apple said it was moving Chinese manufacturing jobs out of the country? If it wouldn’t ban Apple’s products outright, it would almost certainly levy draconian import taxes on them, making them so expensive for consumers that Apple’s sales in China would nosedive.

    Cost reason: Another reason Apple would probably never move all of its manufacturing jobs to the U.S. is because it would increase the cost of its products all over the world. Wages are higher in the U.S. than in other countries where goods are manufactured and those wage hikes would almost certainly be passed on to the consumer in the form of more expensive iPhones and iPads.

    http://www.fastcompany.com/3055611/fast-feed/donald-trump-says-hed-get-apple-to-make-its-products-in-america

  • From chaos to control — The benefits of better contract management

    Rob Woodstock, Accenture managing director, operations strategy for UK and Ireland, says the same lesson is true for all organisations. And while procurement has been successful in creating savings during sourcing and tendering, better management of contracts represents an untapped opportunity to improve performance.

    Additionally:

    This fragmented, complex picture of contract management can mean organisations miss opportunities to save money and face increased legal risks, Woodstock says. It also leads to difficulties understanding the pricing schedules across multiple contracts. “Even for those that are available, a large number are out of date,” he says, adding that there is often no visibility as to when contracts come up for renewal.

    http://www.procurementleaders.com/blog/my-blog–guest-blog/from-chaos-to-control–the-benefits-of-better-contract-management-594920

  • For you procurement nerds out there… there very first purchasing manual ever:

    The Handling of Railroad Supplies — Their Purchase and Disposition, written way back in 1887 by Marshall M. Kirkman and printed by Chas, N. Trivess, has the basic definition of the requirements of a purchaser down flat…

    Google Books: Handling of Railroad Supplies

Photo: Tirza van Dijk